The Indonesian home of Representatives has passed the Revised Special Autonomy work (UU Otsus) for Papua and West Papua. The basis is to tally the development and welfare of the people upon Earth of Cendrawasih through optimizing the special autonomy fund. This amendment (Law) reforms to greater than before oversee proceed in Papua and prioritizes the rights of OAP (Indigenous Papuans), said Deputy Chairman of Commission II of the Indonesian home of Representatives Junimart Girsang to Media Indonesia, Friday (16/7). According to him, reverence for OAP is more important in this law. There is even one article that specifically respects OAP, as in Article 68A.
Read also: Paskalis Kossay calls the Special Autonomy enactment the Golden Bridge to a Prosperous and Independent Papua This article requires that in the context of synchronization, harmonization, evaluation, and coordination of the implementation of special autonomy and early payment in Papua, a special agency is formed which is directly held responsible to the president, chaired by the vice president and consisting of ministers. domestic affairs, the head of Bappenas, the minister of finance and one representative from each province in Papua, he explained. The PDIP politician also said additional articles then highly thought of OAPs rights. The concentration of additional articles empowers OAP resources and conducts elections for the DPRK which are directly elected and adopt appointments for 1/4 of the seats for OAP from the total number of seats in DPRK, he explained. Overall, the Papua Special Autonomy feat lonely has changes and additions, with 20 articles.
The second amendment made to bill Number 21 of 2001 includes amendments to 18 articles and two articles. The supplementary articles, namely Article 6A and Article 68A, in view of that that there are 20 articles. next three articles from the governments proposal, namely Articles 1, 34, and 76 and 15 articles outside the governments proposal, namely Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 17, 20, and an explanation of article 24 paragraph 1, articles 28, 36, 38, 56, 59, 68 and an tally of article 75, he concluded. Meanwhile, a enthusiast of the DPR from the PKB faction, Muhammad Fauzan Nurhuda Yusro, explained that the substance of the amendment to the Special Autonomy deed was more practically enlargement direction greater than the implementation of the special autonomy fund. In particular, the Chapter upon Supervision, particularly Article 67, is not amended but is strengthened through Article 34 paragraph (14). Later on, the handing out of the supervision of revenues in the framework of special autonomy as referred to in paragraph (3) letter b number 4 and number 5, letter e, and letter f will be carried out in a coordinated reveal past their respective authorities by ministries, non-ministerial doling out institutions, regional governments, DPR, DPD, the complete Audit Agency, and give access universities, he explained. A more detailed mechanism on further explanation supervision, he said, would be regulated in a dispensation Regulation (PP), and its preparation was moreover consulted bearing in mind the DPR through the commission in charge.
The change, he continued, was based upon the evaluation results from the previous Otsus. That the governance of the special autonomy budget revenue raises many problems, including lack of transparency, accountability, and nonexistence of targeting. So the special autonomy funds are not enjoyed by the entire Papuan community, he said. He emphasized that the DPR and the executive want Papua to be more liberal to catch up. So related to the disaffection article, the DPR assesses from existing experience that the spread makes the region more innovative in developing its region. see at West Papua now progressing, right, he explained. According to him, to worship the dignity and worth and guarantee the aspirations and affirmation of the original Papuan people, this function reorganizes the affirmative policy in the Papuan Peoples Assembly (MRP) and the Papuan Peoples Assembly (MR Representative Council (DPRP). As regulated in Article 6, there is an other norm to bring out that DPRP members come from members elected in general elections bearing in mind statutory provisions and appointed from Papuan original (OAP) elements, he explained.
The appointed DPRP must not arrive from a embassy party and accommodate 30% of its women. The members of the DPRP who are appointed are or one-fourth of the total members of the DPRP who are elected in the general election with the provisions of the legislation. The term of office is five years and ends simultaneously in the same way as the term of office of the elected DPRP members. Then, a propos supplementary complex provisions something like the appointed members of the DPRP, it is regulated in the PP. The allegation of the house of Representatives connection applies to the DPRP and applies to the district/city or DPRK level. The understanding is the same as that of the DPRP. Only, in the normalization of this bill, it needs to be regulated in a separate article. Therefore, the PKB Faction extremely taking into account the supplement by inserting Article 6A to fiddle with the DPRK, he concluded.